Search Results for 'buildings'

In their annual Fast Cities ranking, Fast Company magazine nominated Seattle as the winner. In addition, they listed twelve other cities that need to be recognized for their individual innovations.

These cities are the following (found on CoolTown Studios):

  • Chicago – Last year’s winner, it’s I-Go Car Sharing program ties public car sharing to its transit system with one ‘Smart Card’.
  • Cleveland, Ohio – Their Reimagining a More Sustainable Cleveland initiative seeks to reclaim abandoned suburban lots back to nature.
  • Tucson, Arizona – It’s Healthy Tucson Initiative will invest $80 million to expand its 700 miles of bikeways and 72 miles of shared-use paths.
  • Taipei, Taiwan (pictured) – The city launched an ambitious program to achieve “zero landfill, total recycling” by 2010.
  • New Orleans – The neighborhood of Broadmoor is singled out as a model for post-Katrina revitalization, and happens to have its own crowdsourcing initiative, Destination Broadmoor.
  • Houston, TX -  The new 12-acre, $122 million Discovery Green park has become a favorite social, recreational destination.
  • Malmo, Sweden – The city plans to reduce its CO2 emissions by 25% from 2008 to 2012, well above the Kyoto Protocol 5% target.
  • Vancouver, Canada – All 18 buildings in Vancouver’s Olympic Village will be LEED Gold in time for the 2010 Winter Games.
  • Philadelphia, San Francisco, Denver and New York are also noted, though not for achievements related to culture and placemaking as the cities above are.

Philadelphia, San Francisco, Denver and New York are also noted, though not for achievements related to culture and placemaking as the cities above are.

Traditionally the city is mapped as a network of streets and large numbers of buildings and blocks. This given space is generally taken as universal and true. The aspect of change, movement and time are often ignored, because they have not one state, but many. The UrbanTick research aims to address this problem by looking at ways to observe and map these processes. By tracking activities and actions it starts to evolve a new perspective on how to define and interpret the city as a collective product of pattern in time.

In this context the UrbanDiary project collects data on the spatial extend of individual’s routines in the wider London region. The project records the movement of participants with the help of GPS devices and aims to capture the beat of the city. The output is a collection of personal statements on how individuals “use” and experience the city.

Urban Diary Map by UrbanTick for UrbanDiary

The pattern represents the occurring repetition in the participant’s behavior. Thick lines start to accumulate on the daily routes and draw out the very personal arteries of the city. To the surprise of most participants the individual activities are rather confined.

The London trajectory map produces a star shape. Compared to records of other cities this characteristic is individual to each city and is determined by the morphology, transport network and citizen behavior.

Depending on the preferences of transport by the participant the emerging patter of activity draws a continuous track or starts to build up isolated and spatially disconnected areas of activity reassembling Guy Deboard’s Naked City (1957). (more…)

The editors from Triple Canopy invited us to visit the new issue of Triple Canopy, an online art and culture magazine. There is a new issue "Urbanism: Model Cities". It is the first of two issues devoted to examining various forms of and approaches to urbanism, considered in relation to the current economic crisis, from the perspectives of a number of writers, researchers, artist, and architects.

Some selected projects:

  • In “The City that Built Itself,” Joshua Bauchner writes about and photographs a Caracas slum where residents have turned utopian modernism on its head, transforming a fifty-year-old superblock housing project into the locus of sprawling improvised developments.
  • Joseph Clarke’s “Infrastructure for Souls” traces the parallel histories of the American megachurch and the corporate-organizational complex over the last century, from the Crystal Palace to the General Motors Technical Center to Googleplex, from Charles Spurgeon to Richard Neutra to Rick Warren. Illustrated with a striking series of images juxtaposing ecclesiastical and office buildings.

The second "Urbanism" issue will be published in June and will feature more interesting projects.

Read the first issue here.

WorldArchitectureNews.com – WAN – is seeking to break the traditional annual awards with the WAN Awards 09. Instead of a typical year award they are now rolling out a bi-monthly programme of international awards by sector.

The different sectors are the following (including deadlines for submissions):

  • Education (28 February 09)
  • Healthcare (30 April 09)
  • Civic Buildings (30 June 09)
  • Office / Commercial (31 August 09)
  • Transport (31 October 09)
  • Residential (31 December 09)

(more…)

In October 2008, Treehugger had an article on the ancient “hula hoop buildings” of China. These buildings are more accurately known as Fujian Tulou, and were built starting in the 12th century as the ultimate gated community. The buildings followed the Chinese dwelling tradition of closed outside, open inside concept: an enclosure wall with living quarters around the peripheral and a common courtyard at the center.

Now Treehugger and designboom are reporting that Urbanus Architects bring them back in modern form.

While the traditional Tulou was a complete circle around an open court  the Architects have filled most of the center with public spaces, retail, a gym and library. (more…)

ISSUE NO.6: LEISURE AND CULTURAL LIFE

 

Dossier

 

This dossier sums up the discussions about leisure and cultural life in the light of the development of the PerfectCity Charter. By asking our readers what is most important about this issue in the city of the future we wanted to identify the relevant ones. And these are the results:

Firstly, we would like to thank everyone who took part in the voting.

As shown in the figure the most important factor about leisure and cultural life in the city of the future is “Parks and gardens”. We touched this factor in a previous poll and dossier. When we had a focus on “Environmental Conditions & Sustainability” we had the factor green space, which was ranked in second place.

Regarding leisure and cultural life in the city of the future, “Parks and gardens” are voted in first place because they are becoming increasingly important as more and more people inhabit urban areas. An article by the Toronto edition of TheStar.com points out why parks are that important. In addition, the PenMetFoundation – a non-profit organization which was established to enhance the general health and well-being of the Gig Harbor Peninsula community by ensuring that all citizens have access to a diversity of recreational, educational and cultural activities in parks – has a list of the benefits of parks in cities. These include the following:

  • Benefits to Individuals
    Parks offer opportunities to enrich the quality of life for persons of all ages and abilities. Strong evidence shows that when people have access to parks, they exercise more. Regular physical activity has been shown to increase health and reduce the risk of a wide range of diseases, including heart disease, hypertension, colon cancer, and diabetes. Physical activity also relieves symptoms of depression and anxiety, improves mood, and enhances psychological well-being. Beyond the benefits of exercise, a growing body of research shows that contact with the natural world improves physical and psychological health. Older adults who participate in a variety of social and recreational opportunities benefit from the social connections and interactions that are fundamental to their well-being.
  • Benefits to Communities
    Parks have long been recognized as key contributors to the aesthetic and physical quality of neighborhoods. Today, we realize that parks are more than recreation and visual assets to communities; they are valuable contributors to larger community policy objectives, such as public health, youth development, job opportunities, social and cultural exchange, and community building. At the community level parks play a special role, they have something to offer everyone from young children and teens, to families, adults and the elderly; their presence can also be a cohesive force. They are more than places to recreate and relate to nature; parks can also offer a multitude of opportunities to engage in arts and music. A park can be a community focal point, a symbol of its vitality and character, adding to its overall health, well-being and quality of life.
  • Benefits to the Economy
    Across the country communities are learning that conserving community greenfrastructure – lands for parks, trails and other public open spaces – is not an expense, but an investment that produces important economic benefits. Research verifies what we intuitively know about the value of parks and related open spaces: they reduce energy use and storm water runoff, increase the value of neighboring property, and improve academic performance among teens. Studies have also shown that crime is lower in the neighborhoods where parks exist and visits to hospitals and emergency rooms are reduced when kids are given a safe alternative to playing in streets and parking lots. The availability of recreation opportunities and park amenities is an important quality-of-life factor for businesses choosing where to locate and for individuals choosing a place to live.
  • Benefits to the Environment
    Community greenfrastructure – parks, community gardens, greenways and other types of public open spaces also benefit the environment. Whether greenfrastructure lands are in ball fields, trails, trees or public open space, they are on the job 24 hours every day serving critical environmental functions that contribute to many of life’s essentials – making water clean and safe for drinking, cleaning the air and returning oxygen to the atmosphere, and providing habitat for wildlife, biodiversity and ecological integrity. In fact, conserving land for people where they live, work and play is often the most cost efficient and effective way to achieving a host of environmental health and related public policy objectives.

“Parks and gardens" is followed by the factor “Schools and universities” in second place. This is also a factor we touched in a previous poll and dossier. In the fifth dossier the most important factor of “Social services” was “Education”.

“Museums and galleries” comes in third place. Museums and galleries have a special value to all of us because they keep history alive and they have importance for people who enjoy history and art, or who are very interested in one particular subject. Especially art museums / galleries are for people who love paintings by very popular artists. In addition, they are a popular tourist activity.
An interview with John McAvity, executive director of the Canadian Museums Association, points out the importance of museums in a tourism context, “In general terms, museums have two audiences. We have the local audience – people in the community a museum serves – and we have tourists. These are quite different audiences, with quite different needs; a museum has a responsibility to try and balance both of those needs.” McAvity adds, “Museums are extremely important in the tourism industry, because if you want to learn about, say, the Gold Rush in the Yukon, you will go to a museum in the Yukon. A significant percentage – in some cases as high as 80% – of people attending museums are tourists. Of course, some museums serve primarily their local communities, and we are encouraging museums to serve their communities even more, because that is where their stakeholders and supporters are.

The factor voted in fourth position is “Opera houses, concert halls and theatres”. These institutions are comparable to “Museums and galleries” and especially made for performing art and live experiences. Other characteristics of “Opera houses, concert halls and theatres” are discussed in the following and inspired by the Valuation Office Agency.
Most concert halls and opera houses are owned by local authorities, although a few are run as a commercial enterprise by private undertakings, providing facilities for short-term hire, while others may be owned and occupied by trusts who may have charitable status. These institutions tend to be located towards the centre of towns and cities, varying in character from Victorian buildings of excessive height and embellishment to modern, compact, well-planned halls. Demand for the use of concert halls and opera houses varies considerably and most are able to remain in use only by the support of grants from local authorities or the Arts Council.
Theatres are the branch of the performing arts defined by Bernard Beckerman as what "occurs when one or more persons, isolated in time and/or space, present themselves to another or others." By this broad definition, theatres have existed since the dawn of man, as a result of human tendency for storytelling. Since its inception, theatres has come to take on many forms, utilizing speech, gesture, music, dance, and spectacle, combining the other performing arts, often as well as the visual arts, into a single artistic form. There is an interesting article on the implicit value of theatres – the importance of live experience.

The factor “Opera houses, concert halls and theatres” is followed by “Sport Facilities” in fifth. In a city there should be, among places to watch other people do professional sports (e.g. football stadiums, indoor arenas, racing circuits etc.), possibilities to do sports and be active: parks should include routes for jogger, cyclist and skater, there should be a large variety of sports hall, sport areas and more for private and organized sport. This is an important factor, mainly in times of an overweighting population in most urban areas.  

The factor voted in six is “Playgrounds”. Playground are like sport facilities for kids. The following extracts from an article found on Bright Hub emphasize the importance of playgrounds and refers to the importance of play in early childhood.

The factor “Playgrounds” is followed by “Demographic structure” in seventh, “Grant and scholarships” in eighth and “Artists funds” in ninth place. On position ten there is “Zoos”.  The two least important factors according to the results of our poll are “Fountains” and “National stadiums”. 

By the end of January our pupil competition “PerfectFrankfurt 2020” had ended and now, after a jury has chosen the winners, we are proud to present the winning projects to you.

Overall, more than 40 projects have been submitted by pupils in the fifth grade and up, from any school in Frankfurt and its surroundings. These projects were assessed and evaluated on the basis of the following categories and could achieve a maximum of 216 points:

  • future-orientedness
  • reference to the city of Frankfurt/Main
  • reference to buildings
  • persuasiveness
  • profundity
  • comprehensibility
  • core statement
  • innovation and originality
  • implementation

The projects were divided into two categories: grades 5-9 and grades 10-13. There were three prizes per category and in addition a special prize.

And these are the winners: (more…)

Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects (LOHA) have designed an eleven unit housing project in West Hollywood. With a new approach to private space, the project emphasizes the need for a central, communal space for both the residents as well as the community at large. Instead of creating an internal courtyard that only residents could enjoy, the building is surrounded by a park that is operated by the city and will be open to the public.

The architects explain the idea of the project, “As a result of shifting the common open space to the exterior and pushing the building to one side, units are organized linearly allowing for “park frontage” and cross-ventilation for every unit. External circulation is used as a buffer between public and private realms and articulated through layers of perforated metal and small opening.” (more…)

Carrot City – Urban Agriculture is an exhibition which shows a variety of possibilities in urban farming and takes place at Toronto’s Design Exchange until April 30th 2009. The aim of the exhibition is to display how the design of cities and building is enabling the production of food in the city.

The background of the background of the exhibition is described as the following:

The role of architecture in food production, distribution and related issues is a new area of study, despite the historical importance of food in cities. The emerging alternative food movement has only just begun to engage with the possible (more…)

Next »