Search Results for 'Canada'

In their annual Fast Cities ranking, Fast Company magazine nominated Seattle as the winner. In addition, they listed twelve other cities that need to be recognized for their individual innovations.

These cities are the following (found on CoolTown Studios):

  • Chicago – Last year’s winner, it’s I-Go Car Sharing program ties public car sharing to its transit system with one ‘Smart Card’.
  • Cleveland, Ohio – Their Reimagining a More Sustainable Cleveland initiative seeks to reclaim abandoned suburban lots back to nature.
  • Tucson, Arizona – It’s Healthy Tucson Initiative will invest $80 million to expand its 700 miles of bikeways and 72 miles of shared-use paths.
  • Taipei, Taiwan (pictured) – The city launched an ambitious program to achieve “zero landfill, total recycling” by 2010.
  • New Orleans – The neighborhood of Broadmoor is singled out as a model for post-Katrina revitalization, and happens to have its own crowdsourcing initiative, Destination Broadmoor.
  • Houston, TX -  The new 12-acre, $122 million Discovery Green park has become a favorite social, recreational destination.
  • Malmo, Sweden – The city plans to reduce its CO2 emissions by 25% from 2008 to 2012, well above the Kyoto Protocol 5% target.
  • Vancouver, Canada – All 18 buildings in Vancouver’s Olympic Village will be LEED Gold in time for the 2010 Winter Games.
  • Philadelphia, San Francisco, Denver and New York are also noted, though not for achievements related to culture and placemaking as the cities above are.

Philadelphia, San Francisco, Denver and New York are also noted, though not for achievements related to culture and placemaking as the cities above are.

ISSUE NO.6: LEISURE AND CULTURAL LIFE

 

Dossier

 

This dossier sums up the discussions about leisure and cultural life in the light of the development of the PerfectCity Charter. By asking our readers what is most important about this issue in the city of the future we wanted to identify the relevant ones. And these are the results:

Firstly, we would like to thank everyone who took part in the voting.

As shown in the figure the most important factor about leisure and cultural life in the city of the future is “Parks and gardens”. We touched this factor in a previous poll and dossier. When we had a focus on “Environmental Conditions & Sustainability” we had the factor green space, which was ranked in second place.

Regarding leisure and cultural life in the city of the future, “Parks and gardens” are voted in first place because they are becoming increasingly important as more and more people inhabit urban areas. An article by the Toronto edition of TheStar.com points out why parks are that important. In addition, the PenMetFoundation – a non-profit organization which was established to enhance the general health and well-being of the Gig Harbor Peninsula community by ensuring that all citizens have access to a diversity of recreational, educational and cultural activities in parks – has a list of the benefits of parks in cities. These include the following:

  • Benefits to Individuals
    Parks offer opportunities to enrich the quality of life for persons of all ages and abilities. Strong evidence shows that when people have access to parks, they exercise more. Regular physical activity has been shown to increase health and reduce the risk of a wide range of diseases, including heart disease, hypertension, colon cancer, and diabetes. Physical activity also relieves symptoms of depression and anxiety, improves mood, and enhances psychological well-being. Beyond the benefits of exercise, a growing body of research shows that contact with the natural world improves physical and psychological health. Older adults who participate in a variety of social and recreational opportunities benefit from the social connections and interactions that are fundamental to their well-being.
  • Benefits to Communities
    Parks have long been recognized as key contributors to the aesthetic and physical quality of neighborhoods. Today, we realize that parks are more than recreation and visual assets to communities; they are valuable contributors to larger community policy objectives, such as public health, youth development, job opportunities, social and cultural exchange, and community building. At the community level parks play a special role, they have something to offer everyone from young children and teens, to families, adults and the elderly; their presence can also be a cohesive force. They are more than places to recreate and relate to nature; parks can also offer a multitude of opportunities to engage in arts and music. A park can be a community focal point, a symbol of its vitality and character, adding to its overall health, well-being and quality of life.
  • Benefits to the Economy
    Across the country communities are learning that conserving community greenfrastructure – lands for parks, trails and other public open spaces – is not an expense, but an investment that produces important economic benefits. Research verifies what we intuitively know about the value of parks and related open spaces: they reduce energy use and storm water runoff, increase the value of neighboring property, and improve academic performance among teens. Studies have also shown that crime is lower in the neighborhoods where parks exist and visits to hospitals and emergency rooms are reduced when kids are given a safe alternative to playing in streets and parking lots. The availability of recreation opportunities and park amenities is an important quality-of-life factor for businesses choosing where to locate and for individuals choosing a place to live.
  • Benefits to the Environment
    Community greenfrastructure – parks, community gardens, greenways and other types of public open spaces also benefit the environment. Whether greenfrastructure lands are in ball fields, trails, trees or public open space, they are on the job 24 hours every day serving critical environmental functions that contribute to many of life’s essentials – making water clean and safe for drinking, cleaning the air and returning oxygen to the atmosphere, and providing habitat for wildlife, biodiversity and ecological integrity. In fact, conserving land for people where they live, work and play is often the most cost efficient and effective way to achieving a host of environmental health and related public policy objectives.

“Parks and gardens" is followed by the factor “Schools and universities” in second place. This is also a factor we touched in a previous poll and dossier. In the fifth dossier the most important factor of “Social services” was “Education”.

“Museums and galleries” comes in third place. Museums and galleries have a special value to all of us because they keep history alive and they have importance for people who enjoy history and art, or who are very interested in one particular subject. Especially art museums / galleries are for people who love paintings by very popular artists. In addition, they are a popular tourist activity.
An interview with John McAvity, executive director of the Canadian Museums Association, points out the importance of museums in a tourism context, “In general terms, museums have two audiences. We have the local audience – people in the community a museum serves – and we have tourists. These are quite different audiences, with quite different needs; a museum has a responsibility to try and balance both of those needs.” McAvity adds, “Museums are extremely important in the tourism industry, because if you want to learn about, say, the Gold Rush in the Yukon, you will go to a museum in the Yukon. A significant percentage – in some cases as high as 80% – of people attending museums are tourists. Of course, some museums serve primarily their local communities, and we are encouraging museums to serve their communities even more, because that is where their stakeholders and supporters are.

The factor voted in fourth position is “Opera houses, concert halls and theatres”. These institutions are comparable to “Museums and galleries” and especially made for performing art and live experiences. Other characteristics of “Opera houses, concert halls and theatres” are discussed in the following and inspired by the Valuation Office Agency.
Most concert halls and opera houses are owned by local authorities, although a few are run as a commercial enterprise by private undertakings, providing facilities for short-term hire, while others may be owned and occupied by trusts who may have charitable status. These institutions tend to be located towards the centre of towns and cities, varying in character from Victorian buildings of excessive height and embellishment to modern, compact, well-planned halls. Demand for the use of concert halls and opera houses varies considerably and most are able to remain in use only by the support of grants from local authorities or the Arts Council.
Theatres are the branch of the performing arts defined by Bernard Beckerman as what "occurs when one or more persons, isolated in time and/or space, present themselves to another or others." By this broad definition, theatres have existed since the dawn of man, as a result of human tendency for storytelling. Since its inception, theatres has come to take on many forms, utilizing speech, gesture, music, dance, and spectacle, combining the other performing arts, often as well as the visual arts, into a single artistic form. There is an interesting article on the implicit value of theatres – the importance of live experience.

The factor “Opera houses, concert halls and theatres” is followed by “Sport Facilities” in fifth. In a city there should be, among places to watch other people do professional sports (e.g. football stadiums, indoor arenas, racing circuits etc.), possibilities to do sports and be active: parks should include routes for jogger, cyclist and skater, there should be a large variety of sports hall, sport areas and more for private and organized sport. This is an important factor, mainly in times of an overweighting population in most urban areas.  

The factor voted in six is “Playgrounds”. Playground are like sport facilities for kids. The following extracts from an article found on Bright Hub emphasize the importance of playgrounds and refers to the importance of play in early childhood.

The factor “Playgrounds” is followed by “Demographic structure” in seventh, “Grant and scholarships” in eighth and “Artists funds” in ninth place. On position ten there is “Zoos”.  The two least important factors according to the results of our poll are “Fountains” and “National stadiums”. 

We all know university cities or college towns. These are defined as communities or small till medium sized town which are dominated by its university population. The university may be large, or there may be several smaller institutions, or the residential population may be small, but college towns in all cases are so dubbed because the educational institution(s) presence pervades economic and social life. Many local residents may be employed by the university – which may be the largest employer in the community, many businesses cater primarily to the university, and indeed the students population may outnumber the local population outright.

With a university dominating a city, there are several advantages a cities benefits from. (more…)

Regarding our PerfectCity Charter we have just started a new poll. This time we want to know what is most important about the economic environment in the City of The Future. To get a little deeper into that issue we want to focus on an interesting index, the so called economic environment index.

The Atlas of Canada site, a website where you can discover Canada through national maps and facts, has a wide range of different maps. There you can find map which displays the quality of life through an economic environment index in Canada.

This map shows the quality of the economic environment: the environment in which people engage in, and benefit from, economic activity that includes aspects of paid employment and household finances. The indicators of the economic environment measure the ability of households to access goods and services important to quality of life. To asses the quality of the economic environment seven indicators are used (you can find some of them as factors to vote for in our poll) regarding household finances and employment/paid work. These indicators are: (more…)

The IULA 2007 goes to Parc Central de Nou Barris i Placa Virrei Amat, Barcelona (Spain), planned by Arriola & Fiol arquitectes, Barcelona/ Spain.

The ceremony of the International Urban Landscape Award (IULA) took place in Frankfurt/Main (Germany) on Friday 5 October. The winner was chosen by the jury from around 60 entries from EU, Switzerland, USA, Canada and Mexico.

 

The official certificate of recognition for the Public Favourite from PerfectCity voting was handed over to a representative of the Department of Urban Planning Bydgoszcz for the project Bydgoszcz Water Junction (Poland). (more…)

For the second time, the International Urban Landscape Award (IULA) will honor a ground-breaking, newly designed or redeveloped urban space. From over 60 entries from EU, Switzerland ,USA, Canada and Mexico 35 international projects were pre-selected for the jury session. PerfectCity.net presented those 35 entries in detail in the IULA Special and invited you to vote for your favourite project until 1 September 2007  – And now there is a winner:

(more…)

For the next two months PerfectCity.net will support the International Urban Landscape Award 2007 in a special rubric IULA special. The IULA special aims to provide the platform for opening and supporting international dialogue, discussion and exchange of expert opinions about urban design and related interesting projects.
For the second time, the International Urban Landscape Award will honor a ground-breaking, newly designed or redeveloped urban space.

From more than 60 entries from EU, Switzerland ,USA, Canada and Mexico 35 international projects were pre-selected for the jury session. The jury identified a short list of 5 projects for the award 2007:

  • Green Arch Paunsdorf, Leipzig, Germany (Häfner/Jiménez, Berlin)
  • MFO-Park in Zürich, Switzerland (Planergemeinschaft MFO/Burckhardt+Partner, Raderschall Landschaftsarchitekten Meilen)
  • Olympic Sculpture Park in Seattle, USA (Weiss/Manfredi, New York)
  • Parc Central de Nou Baris in Barcelona, Spain (Andreu Arriola/Carmen Fiol, Barcelona)
  • Westergasfabriek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Gustafson Porter, London)

PerfectCity.net presents 35 pre-selected projects in detail in the IULA Special. You are invited to vote for your favourite project and to share your thoughts and professional opinions about the projects.

The results of the public vote will be announced at the award ceremony at the End of September and the winner chosen by the public will be invited for a special mentioning. The election of the public favourite is open until September 1st, 2007.

We look forward to your active participation in the discussion about urban design and the future of our cities!

The Bridges, Calgary (CDN)

Project data

Project title The Bridges
Place, country Calgary, Canada
Project type Conversion of a hospital site into urban development
Client The City of Calgary
Planners BKDI Architects, Carlyle+Associates Landscape Architects,
Urban System (Civil Engineers), Calgary/ Canada
Construction period or completion 2001-2008 (Phase 1)
Area not specified
Costs (million Euros) not specified

Project summary

The development is situated on the site of a former hospital outside Calgary. In preparation of the
planning, public forums were held so that residents’ requests could be taken into account. Suggestions
were the revival of the main road, a public green space and pedestrian-friendly streetscape. The
council intended a sustainable planning for both built and open spaces to obtain the “LEEDTM- Gold
certification“ Status .

The development area was subdivided in three construction stages. At the first stage, Murdoch Park
was built on the grounds of the hospital. The park includes a new civic centre and numerous features
of passive and active recreation, for example a large sports ground, an amphitheatre, and a sledging
slope. A newly designed paths network provides barrier-free access and links the park to the surrounding
settlement. Promenades with canopied trees frame the park. They comprise resting places from
where to enjoy the sight of the skyline of Calgary and the far mountains.
The park is bordered on three sides by multi-storey residential and commercial developments. These
feature a high standard of sustainability measures, for example wastewater recycling Wasserwiederverwertung
and solar energy collection.
The 2nd and 3rd construction stages are still underway (Phase 2: 2006-2008, Phase 3: 2007-2013).
The settlement is a best practice project in West Canada of sustainable urban neighbourhood development
with extensive public open spaces and high-density building.

Project data

Project title The plaza of the Forks
Place, country Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Project type Skatepark
Client The Forks Renewal Corp.,The Burns Family Found.,CentreVenture
Planners Van der Zalm & Ass., Newline Skateparks, Scatliff+Miller+Murray Inc., KGS Group, Winnipeg/Canada
Construction period or completion 2006
Area (square feet) 45,000
Costs (million Euros) 1.8

Project summary

This Skateboard Plaza was built with the help of a number of initiators and is a multifunctional public
urban space including a skate park which replicates the typical playground of skateboarders, the
urban streetscape. „ The idea is to essentially duplicate the experiences of the urban environment in
a safe and designated-for-use setting.“ It is situated on an attractive inner city site, where the City of
Winnipeg gathers for a multitude of events and has become the tourist destination in Winnipeg for
young and old.
Skateboarding, often described as illegal and dangerous, gathers new respect and a better public
image here. Instead of getting banned from the urban area, skateboarders interact with other users:
BMX bikers, inline skaters, spectators and tourists, since the skate park has turned into a veritable
sight. The municipality succeeded in creating a well-frequented space where people mix of all ages,
sexes, ethnic and socio-economic groups.

The design was worked out in collaboration with Graffiti Gallery, a local youth programme. In a sculpture
garden, topics are adapted from the future Canadian Museum for Human Rights.
The project is characterised by intensive co-operation and strong personal commitment of the parties
involved. The project was financed by donations from two of the initiators.

Next »